supreme court argument_transcripts
case is on all fours
"But, here, we're not not enforcing the law. We're enforcing the law."
In logic, they are the same but.
rescission
conclusory
"serious doubts about its Illegailty"
serious doubts about legality proves the illegal nature. twisted but taken logic. if its not one, its probably the other? Poor duck, asking "Are you my mom?"
limiting principle
confidence in the rule of the law similar to penalties are designed "not primarily to punish a judge, but rather to preserve the integrity of and public confidence in the judicial system"
hornbook rule like a mathematician's axiom
"It is a foundational principle of administrative law that a court may uphold agency action only on the grounds that the agency invoked when it took the action."
accurate, reasoned, rational, and legally sound explanation Vs unexplained, unsupported, and erroneous legal conclusion
case is on all fours
"But, here, we're not not enforcing the law. We're enforcing the law."
In logic, they are the same but.
rescission
conclusory
"serious doubts about its Illegailty"
serious doubts about legality proves the illegal nature. twisted but taken logic. if its not one, its probably the other? Poor duck, asking "Are you my mom?"
limiting principle
confidence in the rule of the law similar to penalties are designed "not primarily to punish a judge, but rather to preserve the integrity of and public confidence in the judicial system"
hornbook rule like a mathematician's axiom
"It is a foundational principle of administrative law that a court may uphold agency action only on the grounds that the agency invoked when it took the action."
accurate, reasoned, rational, and legally sound explanation Vs unexplained, unsupported, and erroneous legal conclusion
No comments:
Post a Comment