Initially demographic decline will be countered with lots of robots. May be there will be a cap (demand side be - to match what the need would be based on the 2.1 fertility ratio, the reason for the yearly cadence or it could be done daily as it is currently based on the number of births and deaths. What would be the reasons for front loading? Is there a concept of overcrowdedness? other than perception of people. How will the infrastructure change? Is there a need for commute if the software can be wirelessly transferred. Communication vs intelligence. Do you need regular maintenace check if there is a monitor all the time.) on how many robots can be released into action (this could be supply constrained). Maybe some credits that let you increase more. You then keep on working at how to make more productive robots so that you can get the work done with fewer. There could be buyers for the outdated ones keeping the count lower than the allowed limit.
How resilient are these. When do some of the problems stop mattering. eg a forest fire resistant robot. Ofcourse, it makes the area off limits for humans. Every human life gets more precious.
Imagine a vending machine with drone capabilities like the kitchen mix stand.
Then people wont wish for pandemic or plague for population control.
Its history somewhere in the world, if you have a hankering for the past.
No comments:
Post a Comment